Choose AVIF
When every kilobyte matters and you can afford slower encoding in build pipelines.
Format Decision Guide
Both formats outperform legacy JPG/PNG for many use cases. Choose based on performance targets, compatibility requirements, and encoding pipeline speed.
| Criteria | AVIF | WebP |
|---|---|---|
| Compression efficiency | Excellent, often smallest | Very good, typically larger than AVIF |
| Visual quality per byte | Strong on complex photos | Consistent, easier to tune quickly |
| Encoding speed | Slower | Faster |
| Compatibility safety | Modern support, verify edge cases | Safer default across mixed environments |
| Best fit | Performance-critical image delivery | General-purpose modern web format |
When every kilobyte matters and you can afford slower encoding in build pipelines.
When you need reliable compatibility and faster conversion at scale.
Best for critical pages: AVIF primary, WebP fallback strategy.
For production sites, serve AVIF first, then WebP, then JPG/PNG fallback where needed.
<picture>
<source srcset="/images/hero.avif" type="image/avif">
<source srcset="/images/hero.webp" type="image/webp">
<img src="/images/hero.jpg" alt="Hero image" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
</picture>
Step 1
Convert sample assets with Image Converter.
Step 2
Compare sizes and visual quality side-by-side at real display dimensions.
Step 3
Measure LCP and total page weight with your actual layout and CDN settings.
Step 4
Adopt one format default, then add fallback rules for outlier clients.
Explore related tools to keep your workflow fast and consistent.